Juro vs Conga: features, pricing and alternatives

Juro knowledge team, 8 September 2021

Conga is a popular document automation solution for sales teams - but how does it measure up on UI and ease of setup? Let’s take a closer look.

Sales teams often turn to Conga CLM for document automation, finding value in both its native eSignature and Salesforce integration. But how does it measure up for teams outside of sales that also handle contracts on a regular basis - such as legal? How intuitive is the platform? And, if you’re part of a high-velocity business looking to automate contracts as soon as possible, how long does implementation take?

This page explores the features, limitations and pricing of Conga in comparison to Juro’s all-in-one contract automation platform. Use the menu below to navigate this page.

Juro vs Conga: feature comparison | Benefits | Pricing | Independent reviews | FAQs | Alternatives

Juro vs Conga: feature comparison

Features Conga Juro
Rich text editor
Unlimited templates
Natural language Q&A
Internal commenting
External negotiation
Custom branding
Binding eSignature with audit trail
Signing on mobile
Renewal reminders
Approval workflows
Conditional logic
Real-time dashboard
Kanban board
User access levels
Single sign-on
Bulk actions
Salesforce integration
Workday integration
Greenhouse integration
Google Drive integration
Zapier integration

Ready to try an all-in-one contract automation platform? 👇

Get a demo

Conga is a popular solution for sales teams, and has a strong Salesforce integration to help sales streamline their contracts. But it may struggle to meet the needs of legal teams at high-growth businesses, and can require heavy implementation.

The key pain points users encounter with Conga include:

  • Costly implementation: implementation requires heavy investment, and may require the input of a developer - which can get costly, especially at a SaaS business

  • Lack of flexibility: the contract process still lives in Word, which makes it really difficult to design engaging contracts and change the formatting of the document

  • Confusing UI/UX: According to independent reviews (see below), Conga’s template building feature is confusing. Users also claimed the process was clumsy, and required technical expertise

  • Time-consuming process: document generation takes up a lot of time, which slows down the entire workflow, having a negative impact on time to value and ease of setup

For a deep set of features that help visionary legal counsel and the teams they enable to agree and manage contracts in one unified workspace, it's worth considering the benefits of an all-in-one contract automation platform.

Juro benefits

⏱️ Getting to value in weeks - not months

Users claim that implementing Conga involves the time and efforts of a developer - which doesn’t cut it, especially if you’re at a scaling SaaS business, where developer time is precious. At Juro, we aim to get you creating contracts in days, and self-serving on templates without waiting on a developer. With an average time-to-value of 21 days from our customer success and legal engineering teams, Juro enables the end user to take advantage of collaborative workflows, data-rich repositories and much more - at a fraction of the time of other contracts platforms.


Juro is the top-rated contract solution on G2 Crowd for ease of setup.

✨ A dynamic editor built for contracts

Juro’s editor keeps the end-user of contracts in mind and allows users to create beautiful, accessible, and engaging legal documents. The rich media features in Juro allow users to brand their contracts, add images, tables, and even GIFs - without compromising on legal security.


Generate contracts people are excited to sign with Juro's intuitive editor.

🤗 A contracts platform anyone can use

Unlike Conga, Juro was designed to be easy to use and understand. The interface is user-friendly and intuitive - not just for legal teams, but for colleagues in the wider business. Sales teams, HR teams, finance teams, and others can self-serve on contracts from Juro’s beautiful, simplistic UI. Juro’s features, such as a native editor and natural language Q&A flow, make it easy for legal teams to ensure widespread adoption in the business. 

juro-QnA-flowTry Juro's Q&A flow for yourself - click the image above.

⚡ Generate contracts in seconds

As your business scales, so do your contract volumes - and the last thing you want is a contracts platform that can’t keep up. Juro is built to scale with your business, so you can create a contract in seconds, without ever leaving the browser. 

Juro’s other features enable you to easily create, negotiate, agree, and manage contracts. They include: Contract Reader, so static PDF documents live in the same repository as Juro contracts, and are automatically tagged and searchable; Mass signing, so signatories can eSign contracts on the go, without feeling inundated by volume. These contracts live in a unified workspace, and are easily accessible through Juro's Kanban board.

juro-kanban-board-contractsWant to manage contracts in one unified workspace? Get in touch - click the image ☝️

With many more features designed to help you agree more, and faster, we’re here to ensure that contracts are never a blocker when you’re at a scaling business.

Conga pricing vs Juro pricing

Whilst Conga does not have public information about its pricing, users do report a high implementation fee.

Taking Conga’s offering into account, the platform is often received well by sales teams looking to automate their sales contracts. However, contracts often impact various teams in the business - from legal to HR, to finance, and so on.   

That's why Juro's all-in-one contract automation software is often deemed to be better value for money, with flexible plans to suit any business. Head over to our pricing page to select the perfect plan for your needs. Alternatively, hit the button below for more info👇. 

Get a demo



Read independent Conga reviews


Conga is rated on G2 with a score of 4.4/5 - significantly lower than Juro’s 4.7/5 rating. 29 of those reviews rate Conga at 1-3 stars.

On Capterra, Conga is rated 4.5/5 - again, significantly lower than Juro, which is rated 4.8/5. 

Below are verified reviews for Conga from this year (2021):

“At times there are errors in document generation but the errors are not very clear. It is difficult to track the source of the error”

“Poor UX and also really expensive”

“Not enough information explained upfront about the process”

“Conga requires a very talented technical team at your side to squeeze as much value as possible from the [Salesforce CPQ integration]”

“There is a learning curve for using it. You will need to sit down and learn how to build the components to get the reports to have the proper data”


Juro is highly-rated on both G2 (⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ 4.7/5) and Capterra (⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ 4.8/5), leading the market for Ease of Setup and Quality of Support, and with zero 1-3 star reviews on either platform.

Juro users say:

“Excellent piece of legal tech: the layout and structure of Juro mean it is accessible and highly user-friendly. It can be used by both IT-confident people and those who are unfamiliar with tech systems”

"Juro has helped with the speed of contracting, saving the legal team time to allow them to focus on higher-risk deals. On the flip side, the Sales team feels they are in greater control of their contracts and have better visibility over the contracting process. The time to close a small business contract was reduced from 2-5 days to 0-2 days"

"We've created a workflow that is scalable, quicker, automated and allows other teams to self-serve their contracts. For a small legal team this is essential and has saved us so much time"

"Easy to learn, intuitive user interface, anyone can use it without training. The Q&A function is amazing and lets me as a legal person focus on contracts which actually require my expertise in drafting and negotiating. The future is here!"

Frequently asked questions

Does Juro have native eSignature?

Yes. Native, secure, mobile-responsive eSignature is included in all Juro plans at no extra cost, without the need to integrate external solutions, and without the need to provision extra licences.

Will sales teams adopt Juro?

Yes. Juro's implementation takes an average of just 21 days, and its self-serve automation has been adopted by sales teams at fast-growth businesses like Trustpilot, Cazoo and Secret Escapes.

Does Juro integrate with key business systems?

Yes. Juro integrates with Salesforce, Slack, Workday, Greenhouse, Gmail, GDrive and Zapier, as well as shared drives and offering an open API / webhooks. Juro also offers company data integrations to make sure legal details are always accurate.

Which countries does Juro operate in?

Juro has powered more than 200,000 contracts for more than 1,000 companies in more than 65 countries, across Europe, the US, Latin America and Asia.

Who are Juro’s investors?

Juro is backed by:

  • Union Square Ventures: the investors behind Twitter, Kickstarter and Coinbase.

  • Point Nine Capital: the investors behind Zendesk, Revolut and Typeform.

  • The founders of Indeed.com, Gumtree and Wise.

Can I import my contracts from another system?

Yes. Juro offers drag-and-drop import thanks to its AI-powered Contract Reader. You can also upload documents at scale with an accompanying CSV that automatically tags contracts with the right metadata. Alternatively if you have complex needs, we can manage the migration for you with flexible resource. Juro's customer success team can guide you through this process as part of our rapid implementation.

How can I get started with the switch to Juro?

Just talk to our commercial team to book a focused demo and find a plan that's right for you. Click here to book a demo.

Conga alternatives: all-in-one contract automation

If Conga isn’t working for you and you need a solution that is both easier and faster to implement and understand, there are alternatives out there that might be perfect for you.

  • eSignature and email: if you need a solution that covers signing only, then there are many electronic signature solutions you can implement and integrate with email, which limits the automation of contracts to signing only. If you are only interested in eSignature, it might be worth checking out some DocuSign alternatives. 

  • Document generation alternatives: there are plenty of document generation platforms out there for sales teams at SMEs and enterprise businesses. These include: PandaDoc, DealHub, DocuSign CLM, Qwilr, Proposify and more. Browse through the full list on G2.

  • All-in-one contract automation: Juro’s all-in-one platform enables you to create, negotiate, agree and manage contracts without ever leaving the browser. If you’re looking for a unified workspace for contracts, that’s easy to implement and use by both legal and the teams they enable, get in touch. Implementation time is 21 days on average - and you can try Juro for free.

If you’d like to see the value of all-in-one contract automation, get in touch by hitting the button below.

Topics: Contract magic

Download the guide