Juro vs Precisely: features, comparisons and alternatives

Juro knowledge team, 12 November 2021

Precisely is a Swedish digital contracting platform seeking to modernise the contract process. But how does it fare compared to Juro's all-in-one contract automation software? Let's find out. 

Like Juro, Precisely positions itself as an end-to-end contract automation solution, and it’s popular for its post-signature functionality. The software is aimed at a wide range of industries, including but not limited to law firms, e-commerce platforms, life sciences and recruitment companies. 

But since the solution's not focused on the needs of in-house legal teams, is the software intuitive and advanced enough to enable business teams to successfully self-serve on contracts?

Juro vs Precisely: feature comparison | Benefits | Pricing | Independent reviews | FAQs | Alternatives

Juro vs Precisely: feature comparison ⚙️

Features

Precisely

Juro 

Rich text editor
Unlimited templates
Natural language Q&A
Internal commenting
External negotiation
Custom branding Enterprise only
Binding eSignature with audit trail
Review and signing on mobile Signing only
Kanban board
Reminders
Approval workflows
Conditional logic
Real-time dashboard
Analytics
Dedicated customer success manager Enterprise only
User access levels
Single sign-on
Bulk actions
Salesforce integration Enterprise only
Workday integration Enterprise only
Greenhouse integration Enterprise only
Gmail integration Enterprise only
Google Drive integration Enterprise only

Ready to try an all-in-one contract automation platform?👇

Get a demo

Precisely’s contract automation software promises users an end-to-end solution for their contract lifecycle, with features designed to create, e-sign, store, and track contracts. 

Precisely users can create automated templates in their online contract creator and set rules and conditions to make contract creation easier for business teams. These features are similar to those offered by Juro’s native rich-text editor but are packaged somewhat less intuitively and can be more challenging to navigate. 

In Precisely’s contract editor, users are also unable to add custom branding to their contracts without an Enterprise plan and, according to independent reviews, it can take a while to create your own templates using the platform. This won’t be ideal for legal teams that need to create contract templates quickly and efficiently for business teams to self-serve. 

According to our research, some of the key pain points users experience with Precisely include:

  • Unintuitive UI. Precisely’s user interface (UI) isn’t the easiest to use, which prevents commercial teams from managing contracts in the platform confidently.  Without a user-friendly interface, it can be difficult for sales and HR teams to self-serve on contracts. 

  • Only enterprise users can access integrations. According to Precisely’s help center, certain integrations can only be accessed by enterprise plan users. By comparison, Juro users can access integrations with Zapier, Greenhouse, Slack and Google Drive without needing to commit to an enterprise plan.

  • Limited functionality pre-signature. Precisely users express that they want more advanced editing and design functionality when creating contract templates in the platform, as well as the option to add custom branding to these. At present. Precisely’s editing functionality is fairly basic.

Visionary legal counsels and the business teams they enable need a contract tool that’s user-friendly and easy to navigate when managing contracts pre-signature as well as post-signature. They need a tool that's specialised for in-house legal teams - not one that's trying to serve law firms and their distinct contract needs too. 

Scaling businesses require a contract solution that removes friction and empowers commercial teams to self-serve on contracts more efficiently, from start to finish. For these reasons, Juro might be a better option for businesses looking to implement a self-serve workflow.

Let’s explore the various benefits of using Juro for your contracts, and how Juro’s unique, browser-native editor makes the end-to-end contracting process frictionless.

Juro benefits 🚀

🌐 Collaborate on contracts in real-time

With Juro, legal teams and those they enable are able to collaborate on and negotiate contracts in-browser, in real-time. Juro eliminates the need for teams to jump between Word, PDF, email, and shared drives to negotiate a contract, as Juro’s native in-browser editor empowers teams to leave comments, set up approval workflows and control which edits are visible to external parties.

juro-vs-precisely-alternatives-collaboration-feature-min

✍️ Rich-text editor designed for contracts

One of the biggest advantages of Juro is how intuitive and user-friendly Juro’s rich text editor is. Juro’s editor is designed specifically for contracts, allowing users to add an unlimited number of custom fields to contracts, set up conditional logic, and include rich media like images, tables, and GIFs - without compromising on legal security.

With Juro’s advanced editing functionality, legal and business teams can create beautifully designed contracts within seconds, and writing a contract is made simple.juro-vs-precisely-alternatives-rich-text-editor

📈 Capture actionable contract data

Juro allows legal and business teams to capture critical contract data, such as the status of a contract, the owner, renewal dates, and cost per transaction. Juro users can query Juro’s structured, data-rich repository quickly and easily, with up-to-date dashboards and data analytics. 

Juro’s allows businesses to build one source of truth for contracts, replacing Google Drive, Box, DropBox, and local drives as a way to store contracts securely in one unified repository.

juro-vs-precisely-alternatives-contract-data-screenshot-min

🔗 Integrates with popular business-wide software

Unlike Precisely which, according to their help center, locks popular integrations behind an enterprise-only plan, Juro offers access to a wide range of different integrations across its different plans, making contract collaboration more efficient and affordable. 

Even with Juro’s free plan, users can access Google Drive and Slack integrations, whilst Zapier and Greenhouse integrations can be accessed as part of our affordable Team plans. 

Juro integrates with a wide range of platforms to empower commercial teams to manage contracts without needing to leave the systems they love. 

Precisely pricing vs Juro pricing 💰

Precisely offers two main plans for their users: Professional and Enterprise.

Their Professional plan starts from $69 per user per month but doesn’t include access to popular integrations, custom branding, or unlimited templates. Meanwhile, their Enterprise plan starts from $99 per user per month. 

Although Precisely’s pricing plan is reasonable for an end-to-end contract solution, legal teams and those they enable will likely get more value from software that can go beyond the basic functionality required pre-signature, and Precisely lags behind some contract automation software in this regard. 

Juro offers flexible plans to suit businesses of all sizes, with advanced functionality for every stage of the contract lifecycle and integrations available in every plan. Head over to our pricing page to select a plan that’s right for your business, or hit the button below to find out more👇.

Get a demo

Read independent reviews ⭐

Precisely 

Precisely is not very widely reviewed on independent review platforms, as the solution has just two reviews on G2, and only 11 on Capterra, with most of these reviews left by Swedish companies. This makes it challenging to see exactly where Precisely adds value to users’ contract lifecycles and what can be improved. 

However, Precisely users have outlined a few improvements which could be made to the software in their reviews:

“Being able to better customize and get more flexible edit/design options in the template generator would be great”

“UI could be designed more clearly and intuitively”

“In order to save a little more time, it would be nice if there existed a feature that will automatically, with the help of AI, add metadata and notifications/reminders from the contract”

Juro

By comparison, Juro is rated 4.7 out of 5 on G2, and 4.8 out of 5 on Capterra, with reviews from clients all over the world and no reviews rating the solution below 4 stars. 

Our users say:

"Easy to learn, intuitive user interface, anyone can use it without training. The Q&A function is amazing and let me as a legal person focus on contracts which actually require my expertise in drafting and negotiating.The future is here!"

“Juro completely lifted the burden off our legal team by empowering our Sales team to handle the majority of small business contracts from start to finish. The ability to collaborate across teams with full transparency is also a great benefit and has contributed to knowledge sharing between Sales and Legal. The Legal team had full confidence in the process of contract issuance and signing.”

“It has really helped us streamline our processes and save time. We have to produce a lot of contracts and we have a small team so really helps us when time is so precious.”

"Juro has helped with the speed of contracting, saving the legal team time to allow them to focus on higher-risk deals. On the flip side, the Sales team feels they are in greater control of their contracts and have better visibility over the contracting process. The time to close a small business contract was reduced from 2-5 days to 0-2 days"

Want to hear more about how Juro’s all-in-one contract automation software has transformed the contract workflow for legal teams and those they enable? Read some of our case studies.

Frequently asked questions 🤔

Is Juro’s eSignature legally binding?

Yes. Just like a traditional wet signature, Juro’s native eSignature solution is legally binding. Juro’s secure, binding eSignature means that users don’t have to switch tools to agree contracts, and they can sign through a wide range of devices, including mobile.

Which countries does Juro operate in?

To date, Juro has supercharged over 250,000 contracts for over 1,000 companies, with our contract automation software being used in at least 65 countries across Europe, the US, Latin America, and Asia. 

Who are Juro’s investors?

Juro is backed by numerous investors, including:

  • Union Square Ventures: the investors behind Twitter, Kickstarter and Coinbase.
  • Point Nine Capital: the investors behind Zendesk, Revolut and Typeform.
  • The founders of Indeed.com, Gumtree and Wise

Can I import contracts from another system into Juro?

Absolutely. Juro users can quickly and easily import existing contracts into Juro from another system using our drag-and-drop import function. Juro users can upload documents at scale with an accompanying CSV that automatically tags contracts with the right metadata. 

How can I move to Juro? 

Get in touch. Juro’s commercial team is ready to deliver a focused demo and help you find the perfect plan for your business.

Precisely alternatives: all-in-one contract automation

If Precisely doesn’t deliver the functionality and integrations needed for your business, or if you need something different, why not consider different kinds of contract tools? This includes:

  • eSignature competitors: If you only need a solution for signing contracts electronically, then you might want to consider an eSignature solution. There are plenty of DocuSign alternatives on the market to choose from.  

  • Contract lifecycle management: Enterprise-minded solutions from SAP, Ariba and Oracle offer Word- and PDF-based solutions aimed at large corporations. However, since they typically have 6-12 month implementation periods, they aren’t ideal for businesses that want to get value quickly. Find out more by exploring G2 Crowd.

  • All-in-one contract automation: Juro's all-in-one platform enables businesses to reduce several manual systems to just one. All-in-one contract automation software covers your contract lifecycle from end-to-end and empowers commercial teams to self-serve on contracts using collaborative workflows and a data-rich contract repository. With Juro, the typical implementation time is just 21 days.

If you’d like to find out how Juro’s contract automation software can create a more efficient workflow for your contracts, hit the button below. 

Topics: Contract magic

Download the guide